Closed
Bug 56162
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
mozilla does not react gracefully to ungraceful window close
Categories
(Core :: XUL, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: cesarb, Assigned: chofmann)
Details
(Keywords: crash, Whiteboard: [needs retesting on Linux with Enlightenment])
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test9-pre1 i686; en-US; m18)
Gecko/20001009
BuildID: 2000100908
If a window is closed ungracefully (using the "Anihilate" command in
Enlightenment (right click on close button), for instance), mozilla segvs
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open mozilla.
2. Open as many windows as you want
3. (Using Enlightenment) right-click in the 'X' in the title bar. Other window
managers have a similar command.
Actual Results: A bunch of Gdk-WARNING **: GdkWindow 0x440002d unexpectedly
destroyed (with different numbers each time) and a segv message from the sh wrapper.
Expected Results: Something sane. At least not closing all windows with a segv.
If there were 2 or more windows, it should recover; else, it should gracefully quit.
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
over to XPApps. I can confrim this with 101108 mozilla trunk linux build. I
think this is a recent regression.
Assignee: asa → don
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Browser-General → XP Apps
Ever confirmed: true
QA Contact: doronr → sairuh
Pavlov, any idea what's going wrong here?
Assignee: don → pavlov
Component: XP Apps → Browser-General
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
New behavior (2000101908Mtrunk): now it doesn't crash, it just doesn't take
notice that the windows were closed.
This means that, besides spewing a screenful of horrible GTK messages in the
console, mozilla won't quit when you close all its windows.
To reproduce: open two windows. right-click-close (destroy) both. Notice mozilla
is still running. (Tested only once here.)
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
With 2 windows open, killing the second one still segvs mozilla. Marking as
crasher. Crashers should be "critical", should the severity go up too?
Tested on 2001021908.
Keywords: crash
![]() |
||
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
->toolkit?
Component: Browser-General → XP Toolkit/Widgets
QA Contact: sairuh → jrgm
![]() |
||
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
Ok, critical since it does take out the app.
(But, on the other hand, we are taking "Annihilate" literally :-]
Severity: normal → critical
![]() |
||
Comment 8•24 years ago
|
||
i still see this using a debug from noon today, as well as 2001.04.12.08 verif
bits. i don't think this is a crash, per se...more like a hang, so changing
keyword.
Pav, are you the right owner? Might someone in Apps have more cycles for this
since you're busy on imagelib?
![]() |
||
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
pavlov is *so* not going to work on this :)
Assignee: pavlov → dr
Severity: critical → normal
Keywords: crash
Priority: P3 → P4
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9.1
![]() |
||
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
->0.9.3 (not a netscape rtm stopper, per pdt)
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9.2 → mozilla0.9.3
![]() |
||
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
pushing back up to 0.9.2. this should be very easy to bulletproof, and should be
done for netscape rtm.
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9.3 → mozilla0.9.2
![]() |
||
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
[spam] pushing off non-critical 0.9.2 bugs to 0.9.3. please take the helpwanted
keyword to heart if you'd like to see these fixed in 0.9.2!
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9.2 → mozilla0.9.3
![]() |
||
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
[spam] dr@netscape.com's bugs subject to redistribution by chofmann. R!
Assignee: dr → chofmann
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Priority: P4 → --
Target Milestone: Future → ---
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•23 years ago
|
||
Well, it does crash here (with some Gtk errors and $? of 1 -- no SEGV now). I
don't see a hang. Crashes should be critical. Correct me if I'm wrong.
IMHO it would be dataloss if it weren't a crash (the definition for dataloss
excludes crashes).
Severity: normal → critical
Keywords: hang
Comment 16•15 years ago
|
||
Documentation for Enlightenment seems to describe Annihilate in two vague, conflicting ways:
"Annihilate destroys the window without regard to the application the window belongs to, which is especially useful if the application refuses to respond to being closed with Close."
"Annihilate - This will kill the application if you are having trouble closing the window."
Whiteboard: [needs retesting on Linux with Enlightenment]
![]() |
||
Comment 17•13 years ago
|
||
This didn't get new info for a long time. If this is still happening, please add an appropriate crash ID link from about:crashes when reopening, as in its current form, this is hard for developers to analyze or work on.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•