Closed
Bug 1331578
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
stylo: Stylo is slower than Gecko on etc/ci/performance TP5 tests
Categories
(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect, P1)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: shinglyu, Assigned: bholley)
References
(Depends on 1 open bug, Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
17.15 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
I ran the performance test in Servo's etc/ci/performance on TP5 test suite. Here are the result for comparing Stylo (release build) with Gecko 52
=================
595.0 774.0 +179.0 +30.08% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/globo.com/www.globo.com/index.html.
360.0 792.0 +432.0 +120.00% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/56.com/www.56.com/index.html.
287.0 524.0 +237.0 +82.58% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/rakuten.co.jp/www.rakuten.co.jp/index.html.
135.0 228.0 +93.0 +68.89% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/chemistry.about.com/chemistry.about.com/index.html.
293.0 397.0 +104.0 +35.49% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/huffingtonpost.com/www.huffingtonpost.com/index.html.
203.0 275.0 +72.0 +35.47% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/imgur.com/imgur.com/gallery/index.html.
135.0 212.0 +77.0 +57.04% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/ezinearticles.com/ezinearticles.com/index.html@Migraine-Ocular---The-Eye-Migraines&id=4684133.html.
259.0 661.0 +402.0 +155.21% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/myspace.com/www.myspace.com/albumart.html.
160.0 310.0 +150.0 +93.75% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/mail.ru/mail.ru/index.html.
230.0 345.0 +115.0 +50.00% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/tudou.com/www.tudou.com/index.html.
91.0 198.0 +107.0 +117.58% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/goo.ne.jp/goo.ne.jp/index.html.
198.0 353.0 +155.0 +78.28% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/bbc.co.uk/www.bbc.co.uk/news/index.html.
381.0 564.0 +183.0 +48.03% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/youku.com/www.youku.com/index.html.
104.0 150.0 +46.0 +44.23% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/w3.org/www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/htmlcss.html.
136.0 218.0 +82.0 +60.29% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/beatonna.livejournal.com/beatonna.livejournal.com/index.html.
170.0 362.0 +192.0 +112.94% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/dailymotion.com/www.dailymotion.com/us.html.
190.0 307.0 +117.0 +61.58% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/cgi.ebay.com/cgi.ebay.com/ALL-NEW-KINDLE-3-eBOOK-WIRELESS-READING-DEVICE-W-WIFI-/130496077314@pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item1e622c1e02.html.
172.0 281.0 +109.0 +63.37% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/reddit.com/www.reddit.com/index.html.
231.0 362.0 +131.0 +56.71% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/stackoverflow.com/stackoverflow.com/questions/184618/what-is-the-best-comment-in-source-code-you-have-ever-encountered.html.
455.0 599.0 +144.0 +31.65% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/dailymail.co.uk/www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html.
249.0 373.0 +124.0 +49.80% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/yelp.com/www.yelp.com/biz/alexanders-steakhouse-cupertino.html.
143.0 280.0 +137.0 +95.80% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/youtube.com/www.youtube.com/music.html.
407.0 647.0 +240.0 +58.97% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/amazon.com/www.amazon.com/Kindle-Wireless-Reader-Wifi-Graphite/dp/B002Y27P3M/507846.html.
56.0 75.0 +19.0 +33.93% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/google.com/www.google.com/search@q=mozilla.html.
214.0 444.0 +230.0 +107.48% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/spiegel.de/www.spiegel.de/index.html.
173.0 283.0 +110.0 +63.58% http://localhost:8000/page_load_test/tp5n/page.renren.com/page.renren.com/index.html.
======================
The columns means (from left to right)
* Gecko page load time
* Stylo page load time
* (Stylo - Gecko) page load time difference
* page load time difference in percentage
* Test case
All the page load time for Stylo is slower then Gecko, ranging from 30% to 240% slower.
You can find instructions on how to run this yourself here: https://github.com/servo/servo/tree/master/etc/ci/performance
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Yeah, this wouldn't surprise me a lot right now. We'd be faster in a full restyle I think, but I suspect these results may mean one of two things:
* That our incremental restyle isn't quite there yet (and that's known).
* That our CSS parser is slower (see https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/13778) for an example.
CCing Bobby and Simon for that.
Shing, could you run an instrumented build against these test cases to see how many elements are we restyling? That'd mean adding a counter in recalc_style_at in Servo, and in ElementRestyler::Restyle in Gecko, and check the difference.
It'd be nice to know if the page load time drop from stylo comes from CSS parsing, or restyling (or both).
Updated•9 years ago
|
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Shing, great work getting Talos running with Stylo!
Blocking the stylo-nightly milestone bug 1330412 because we don't want to enable Stylo in Nightly until it is faster than Gecko.
Blocks: stylo-nightly
Flags: needinfo?(cpeterson)
Summary: [Stylo] Stylo is slow → [Stylo] Stylo is slower than Gecko on tp5 Talos tests
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Emilio: Is the instrumented build code available? Or are you suggesting me writing one myself?
Chris: It's not Talos yet, I'm using Servo's performance test, but running the same test case as Talos.
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Summary: [Stylo] Stylo is slower than Gecko on tp5 Talos tests → [Stylo] Stylo is slower than Gecko on etc/ci/performance Talos tests
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Summary: [Stylo] Stylo is slower than Gecko on etc/ci/performance Talos tests → [Stylo] Stylo is slower than Gecko on etc/ci/performance TP5 tests
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Shing Lyu [:shinglyu] from comment #4)
> Emilio: Is the instrumented build code available? Or are you suggesting me
> writing one myself?
I think he may have been suggesting the latter, but it might be a bit involved. I filed bug 1331856 to do this.
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → bobbyholley
Priority: -- → P1
Summary: [Stylo] Stylo is slower than Gecko on etc/ci/performance TP5 tests → stylo: Stylo is slower than Gecko on etc/ci/performance TP5 tests
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
Some new results, to summarize:
1. Stylo (parallel, 6 threads) is slightly slow than Gecko in general, but we do have some big wins like amazon.com & hoffintonpost.com. On the other hand, some sites are extremely slow Stylo like myspace and bild.de
2. Parallel stylo is not faster than sequential stylo. (see below.) The difference is around -5% to 5%, centered around 0%. This might indicate a big risk in our claim that parallelism is useful for the style system.
Gecko vs Stylo (parallel)
test gecko stylo difference
----------------------------------------------------------------
tudou.com 315.36 402.52 -27.64%
youtube.com 267.44 308.92 -15.51%
sohu.com 462.68 506.72 -9.52%
store.apple.com 354.28 509.2 -43.73%
people.com.cn 380.96 410.08 -7.64%
rakuten.co.jp 440.92 539.76 -22.42%
myspace.com 447.4 700.92 -56.67%
stackoverflow.com 403.92 475.68 -17.77%
ifeng.com 494.32 486.68 1.55%
cgi.ebay.com 301.12 329.44 -9.40%
ezinearticles.com 209.64 214.6 -2.37%
thepiratebay.org 298.8 323.32 -8.21%
media.photobucket.com 221.64 245.76 -10.88%
digg.com 367.64 421.28 -14.59%
huffingtonpost.com 586.4 505.36 13.82%
noimpactman.typepad.com 328.8 319.2 2.92%
163.com 609.32 673.36 -10.51%
dailymotion.com 304.84 385.84 -26.57%
chinaz.com 278.16 305.16 -9.71%
w3.org 179.6 192.52 -7.19%
chemistry.about.com 183.52 205.64 -12.05%
mashable.com 575.52 649.84 -12.91%
aljazeera.net 462.64 465.44 -0.61%
youku.com 475.4 506.36 -6.51%
reuters.com 444.76 477.36 -7.33%
reddit.com 286.68 311.88 -8.79%
dailymail.co.uk 579.56 592.48 -2.23%
uol.com.br 455.08 486.32 -6.86%
naver.com 414.52 462.16 -11.49%
page.renren.com 251.64 267.76 -6.41%
xinhuanet.com 826.96 966.04 -16.82%
cnn.com 432.28 495.96 -14.73%
amazon.com 813.76 652.44 19.82%
slideshare.net 321.88 373.72 -16.11%
56.com 601.2 680.52 -13.19%
imgur.com 254.4 268.12 -5.39%
wsj.com 496.04 601.92 -21.35%
bbc.co.uk 312.96 290.28 7.25%
guardian.co.uk 365.96 399.12 -9.06%
beatonna.livejournal.com 158.24 163.52 -3.34%
globo.com 492.56 678.64 -37.78%
google.com 129.92 136.0 -4.68%
xunlei.com 773.4 860.76 -11.30%
mail.ru 349.24 422.04 -20.85%
homeway.com.cn 436.16 517.52 -18.65%
bild.de 1042.68 1470.52 -41.03%
spiegel.de 397.92 431.92 -8.54%
imdb.com 413.68 439.2 -6.17%
goo.ne.jp 156.88 178.56 -13.82%
indiatimes.com 433.2 466.36 -7.65%
yelp.com 501.36 522.6 -4.24%
Sequential Stylo vs Parallel Stylo (6 threads)
test sequential parallel difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tudou.com 424.6 402.52 5.20%
youtube.com 320.28 308.92 3.55%
sohu.com 514.12 506.72 1.44%
store.apple.com 510.28 509.2 0.21%
people.com.cn 408.52 410.08 -0.38%
rakuten.co.jp 511.32 539.76 -5.56%
myspace.com 673.28 700.92 -4.11%
stackoverflow.com 500.6 475.68 4.98%
ifeng.com 496.2 486.68 1.92%
cgi.ebay.com 318.36 329.44 -3.48%
ezinearticles.com 204.44 214.6 -4.97%
thepiratebay.org 339.24 323.32 4.69%
media.photobucket.com 226.2 245.76 -8.65%
digg.com 391.04 421.28 -7.73%
huffingtonpost.com 531.44 505.36 4.91%
noimpactman.typepad.com 306.84 319.2 -4.03%
163.com 636.52 673.36 -5.79%
dailymotion.com 378.4 385.84 -1.97%
chinaz.com 293.24 305.16 -4.06%
w3.org 175.96 192.52 -9.41%
chemistry.about.com 195.32 205.64 -5.28%
mashable.com 634.48 649.84 -2.42%
aljazeera.net 452.84 465.44 -2.78%
youku.com 537.72 506.36 5.83%
reuters.com 461.76 477.36 -3.38%
reddit.com 312.36 311.88 0.15%
dailymail.co.uk 639.04 592.48 7.29%
uol.com.br 474.48 486.32 -2.50%
naver.com 439.12 462.16 -5.25%
page.renren.com 261.28 267.76 -2.48%
xinhuanet.com 940.16 966.04 -2.75%
cnn.com 483.56 495.96 -2.56%
amazon.com 677.68 652.44 3.72%
slideshare.net 356.6 373.72 -4.80%
56.com 665.84 680.52 -2.20%
imgur.com 251.76 268.12 -6.50%
wsj.com 609.56 601.92 1.25%
bbc.co.uk 278.64 290.28 -4.18%
guardian.co.uk 398.4 399.12 -0.18%
beatonna.livejournal.com 161.84 163.52 -1.04%
globo.com 701.16 678.64 3.21%
google.com 130.08 136.0 -4.55%
xunlei.com 803.32 860.76 -7.15%
mail.ru 412.08 422.04 -2.42%
homeway.com.cn 509.76 517.52 -1.52%
bild.de 1613.04 1470.52 8.84%
spiegel.de 436.52 431.92 1.05%
imdb.com 416.88 439.2 -5.35%
goo.ne.jp 167.12 178.56 -6.85%
indiatimes.com 443.96 466.36 -5.05%
yelp.com 533.56 522.6 2.05%
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
The blue one is Stylo vs Gecko comparison. The orange is parallel stylo vs sequential stylo.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•8 years ago
|
||
Looked at this a bit last week, there's a bunch of dumb stuff we're doing. We haven't spent much time optimizing the actual styling yet, which I plan to do over the next couple of weeks. We should watch what that does to the numbers here, since I expect them to improve considerably.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•8 years ago
|
||
The graphs are pretty much all at parity at this point, mostly because it turns out that the 2011-era sites don't have that much styling in them. We'll keep an eye on these numbers, but this bug as-filed is fixed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•